Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Gandhi


"Generations to come will scarcely believe that such a one as this walked the earth in flesh and blood."

That tribute from Albert Einstein was one of many paid Mohandas K. Gandhi after he was assassinated by a fellow Hindu who disapproved of the leader's tolerance of other religions. For the sweeping film biography of this slightly built man who became a towering 20th-century political presence, Richard Attenborough shot almost entirely in India--including Porbandar, Gujarat, the place where the leader of the Indian Nationalist Movement was born. Eventually, the people of India would call Gandhi "Mahatma," or "great soul," because of his revolutionary method of non-violent civil disobedience, which he first used as a young attorney in South Africa to defy British laws that unfairly made Indians second-class citizens.

After 21 years in South Africa, Gandhi would return to India and, five years later, lead the fight for independence using the same non-violent approach. After the British gave India home rule in 1947, Gandhi was saddened that, despite all his efforts and teachings, a split between Hindus and Muslims led to riots and the eventual formation of two states-India and Pakistan. Had he lived long enough, he certainly would have taken consolation in the fact that his methods inspired Dr. Martin Luther King to use passive resistance to lead the Civil Rights Movement in America. But assassination seems an ironic but all-too-common end for pacifists.

Although Attenborough's sprawling film logs in at 191 minutes, it has the same riveting quality as David Lean's "Lawrence of Arabia." It's a biographical epic that gets to the heart of the character and also captures the spirit of the age. Then again, the historical figure is so fascinating and the script, direction, editing, and performances are all so convincing that it's hard not to be moved by Gandhi's story and by the phenomenal portrayal given by Ben Kingsley, a half-Indian who was also born in the state of Gujarat.

"Gandhi" was Attenborough's and Kingsley's master work, with Attenborough walking off the Academy Awards stage with statues for Best Picture and Best Direction, and Kingsley taking home the Oscar for Best Actor. Out of 11 nominations, "Gandhi" won eight. It was also honored for Best Art Direction/Set Decoration, Best Cinematography, Best Costume Design, Best Editing, and Best Original Screenplay-failing to win only for Make-up, Music, and Sound.

In accepting the award for Best Picture, Attenborough remarked that it wasn't the film or the director that the Academy honored that evening, but Gandhi himself. It's easy to see why he would be so sensitive to the shadow that Gandhi cast, because the scene from the movie that required the most extras-some 300,000-drew two-thirds that number as volunteers, people simply wishing to pay tribute to Gandhi once more in this remarkable funeral-procession scene.

"Gandhi" has a similar feel to "Lawrence of Arabia." The cast itself feels like a Who's Who of British cinema, with people like John Gielgud, John Mills, and Trevor Howard putting in appearances. The pacing is unhurried but certainly not slow, the cinematography makes the land and its people a major character in the film, and it begins with the main figure's death, the rest recalled in flashback. There are also dramatic jumps in time. We never, for example, get the sense that Gandhi was in South Africa as long as he really was. But while both heroes are pursued by media, those characters and their storylines aren't quite as developed in "Gandhi" as they were in Lean's film. That's really my only complaint about this otherwise-perfect film. Some of the characters, like the journalists, seem only tangential to the thrust of the narrative, and their interaction with Gandhi does little to further illuminate his character or theirs--only to underscore the fascination with Gandhi that the world had. And frankly, there are better ways to do that.

ans of the film will be glad that Sony finally put some thought and work into the bonus features. The "Special Edition" had only an interview with Kingsley talking about the film, four newsreel clips on the real Gandhi, quotes from Gandhi, and a photo gallery. This new, two-disc version offers 90 minutes of new material, with a director's commentary and nine short features added to the previous materials. It's not exactly the epic treatment, but this compelling story of activism finally gets the package of extras it deserves.

"Generations to come will scarcely believe that such a one as this walked the earth in flesh and blood."

That tribute from Albert Einstein was one of many paid Mohandas K. Gandhi after he was assassinated by a fellow Hindu who disapproved of the leader's tolerance of other religions. For the sweeping film biography of this slightly built man who became a towering 20th-century political presence, Richard Attenborough shot almost entirely in India--including Porbandar, Gujarat, the place where the leader of the Indian Nationalist Movement was born. Eventually, the people of India would call Gandhi "Mahatma," or "great soul," because of his revolutionary method of non-violent civil disobedience, which he first used as a young attorney in South Africa to defy British laws that unfairly made Indians second-class citizens.

After 21 years in South Africa, Gandhi would return to India and, five years later, lead the fight for independence using the same non-violent approach. After the British gave India home rule in 1947, Gandhi was saddened that, despite all his efforts and teachings, a split between Hindus and Muslims led to riots and the eventual formation of two states-India and Pakistan. Had he lived long enough, he certainly would have taken consolation in the fact that his methods inspired Dr. Martin Luther King to use passive resistance to lead the Civil Rights Movement in America. But assassination seems an ironic but all-too-common end for pacifists.

Although Attenborough's sprawling film logs in at 191 minutes, it has the same riveting quality as David Lean's "Lawrence of Arabia." It's a biographical epic that gets to the heart of the character and also captures the spirit of the age. Then again, the historical figure is so fascinating and the script, direction, editing, and performances are all so convincing that it's hard not to be moved by Gandhi's story and by the phenomenal portrayal given by Ben Kingsley, a half-Indian who was also born in the state of Gujarat.

"Gandhi" was Attenborough's and Kingsley's master work, with Attenborough walking off the Academy Awards stage with statues for Best Picture and Best Direction, and Kingsley taking home the Oscar for Best Actor. Out of 11 nominations, "Gandhi" won eight. It was also honored for Best Art Direction/Set Decoration, Best Cinematography, Best Costume Design, Best Editing, and Best Original Screenplay-failing to win only for Make-up, Music, and Sound.

In accepting the award for Best Picture, Attenborough remarked that it wasn't the film or the director that the Academy honored that evening, but Gandhi himself. It's easy to see why he would be so sensitive to the shadow that Gandhi cast, because the scene from the movie that required the most extras-some 300,000-drew two-thirds that number as volunteers, people simply wishing to pay tribute to Gandhi once more in this remarkable funeral-procession scene.

"Gandhi" has a similar feel to "Lawrence of Arabia." The cast itself feels like a Who's Who of British cinema, with people like John Gielgud, John Mills, and Trevor Howard putting in appearances. The pacing is unhurried but certainly not slow, the cinematography makes the land and its people a major character in the film, and it begins with the main figure's death, the rest recalled in flashback. There are also dramatic jumps in time. We never, for example, get the sense that Gandhi was in South Africa as long as he really was. But while both heroes are pursued by media, those characters and their storylines aren't quite as developed in "Gandhi" as they were in Lean's film. That's really my only complaint about this otherwise-perfect film. Some of the characters, like the journalists, seem only tangential to the thrust of the narrative, and their interaction with Gandhi does little to further illuminate his character or theirs--only to underscore the fascination with Gandhi that the world had. And frankly, there are better ways to do that.

ans of the film will be glad that Sony finally put some thought and work into the bonus features. The "Special Edition" had only an interview with Kingsley talking about the film, four newsreel clips on the real Gandhi, quotes from Gandhi, and a photo gallery. This new, two-disc version offers 90 minutes of new material, with a director's commentary and nine short features added to the previous materials. It's not exactly the epic treatment, but this compelling story of activism finally gets the package of extras it deserves.

No comments: